KBLover wrote:jellyfish wrote:Yes, we may be WORTH more money, but that sure doesn't mean they're going to PAY us more money.
What company are you with that you get paid hundreds per month?
I notice you didn't get a reply.
Makes me wonder.
This makes no sense whatsoever.jellyfish wrote:I always answer no. I don't think it is fair to disqualify someone just because they have done a similar survey recently. Therefore, no guilt on my part.
Absolutely Flutelaura. Well said!flutelaura wrote:If we advocate dishonesty, then it stands to reason firms will have more reason not to trust - that will lead to lower rewards.
I implore anyone who takes surveys to be implicitly honest - only then can firms rely on the results statistically. And of course, we will be worth more money!
Box-in-Jack wrote:This makes no sense whatsoever.jellyfish wrote:I always answer no. I don't think it is fair to disqualify someone just because they have done a similar survey recently. Therefore, no guilt on my part.
You're allowing your greed for personal incentives to override their need for accurate/useful information; you're the exact reason that they have to employ screening tactics.
'You don't think it's fair, therefore you feel no guilt'; and you carry the crucifix banner?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest